Flowers v. Above-All-Roofing, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Flowers v. Above-All-Roofing, Inc.

737 So. 2d 594, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8656, 1999 WL 435197

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 30, 1999

DocketNo. 98-2050

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 737 So. 2d 594 (Flowers v. Above-All-Roofing, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Flowers v. Above-All-Roofing, Inc., 737 So. 2d 594, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8656, 1999 WL 435197 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As appellees’ counsel conceded at oral argument, that the judge of compensation claims (JCC) had no authority to enter the order under review and that the order also had no legally binding effect on the parties, we vacate the JCC’s order determining that the employer/carrier was entitled to a vocational evaluation of the claimant pursuant to section 440.15(l)(e) and section 440.491, Florida Statutes (1997).

ERVIN, WOLF and WEBSTER, JJ., ■ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

As appellees’ counsel conceded at oral argument, that the judge of compensation claims (JCC) had no authority to enter the order under review and that the order also had no legally binding effect on the parties, we vacate the JCC’s order determining that the employer/carrier was entitled to a vocational evaluation of the claimant pursuant to section 440.15(l)(e) and section 440.491, Florida Statutes (1997).

ERVIN, WOLF and WEBSTER, JJ., ■ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

737 So. 2d 594, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8656, 1999 WL 435197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flowers-v-above-all-roofing-inc-fladistctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack