Flournoy v. State

110 S.E. 329, 28 Ga. App. 65, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 303
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 17, 1922
Docket13010
StatusPublished

This text of 110 S.E. 329 (Flournoy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Flournoy v. State, 110 S.E. 329, 28 Ga. App. 65, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 303 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Luke, J.

This case is here upon the general assignment of error that the verdict was unauthorized by the evidence. The evidence fully authorized the verdict, indeed it almost demanded the defendant’s conviction. It was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 S.E. 329, 28 Ga. App. 65, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flournoy-v-state-gactapp-1922.