Flournoy v. State

110 S.E. 329, 28 Ga. App. 65, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 303
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 17, 1922·No. 13010·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

This case is here upon the general assignment of error that the verdict was unauthorized by the evidence. The evidence fully authorized the verdict, indeed it almost demanded the defendant’s conviction. It was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Flournoy v. State, 110 S.E. 329, 28 Ga. App. 65, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 303 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

110 S.E. 329 (Flournoy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.