Flournoy v. Rubey
This text of 28 Ky. 322 (Flournoy v. Rubey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
This is a motion by Rubey against the sheriff of Scott, for a failure by his deputy to return a fieri facias endorsed for bank notes, in favor of Rubey within a month from the return day. The circuit court rendered judgment against the sheriff for the amount of the execution and current interest, and thirty peí darnagesin commonwealth paper. ° r r
The judgment is not warranted by law.
The sheriff is liable only for the amount of princiPa^ atld costs, and interest to the lime when his liability to the motion accrued, and thirty per cent, on that aggregate. And wcknow of no law which authorizes a jndgment hi such a case for commonwealth paper. If the officer had collected commonwealth notes, ajudgment for their juominal amount in kind, would iiave been Pr0Per> according to the act of 1827, on that subject, Bui for failing to return the execution, the sheriff rendered himself responsible for the value of its amount a£ ¡;le time he became liable, and thirty per cent, thereon, and no more.
Wherefore, the judgment is reversed, and the case remanded, in order that a judgment may be rendered according to this opinion, on proof of the value of commonwealth paper on the day when the sheriff’s liar' bility to the motion accrued.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
28 Ky. 322, 5 J.J. Marsh. 322, 1831 Ky. LEXIS 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flournoy-v-rubey-kyctapp-1831.