Flournoy v. Olshan

246 S.E.2d 517, 146 Ga. App. 317, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2334
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 31, 1978
Docket55771
StatusPublished

This text of 246 S.E.2d 517 (Flournoy v. Olshan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Flournoy v. Olshan, 246 S.E.2d 517, 146 Ga. App. 317, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2334 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978).

Opinion

Webb, Judge.

Appellants have failed to demonstrate error affirmatively by the record as required by the rules (18 (c)(3)) and decisions of this court. E. g., Smith v. Forrester, 132 Ga. App. 426 (208 SE2d 199) (1974). "In these circumstances we have insufficient cause to overturn the judgment of the trial court.” Rambo v. Fulton Financial Corp., 145 Ga. App. 791, 792 (1978).

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian, P. J., and MeMurray, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rambo v. FULTON FINANCIAL CORPORATION
245 S.E.2d 12 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)
Smith v. Forrester
208 S.E.2d 199 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
246 S.E.2d 517, 146 Ga. App. 317, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flournoy-v-olshan-gactapp-1978.