Flournoy v. Liddon

Supreme Court of Florida

Flournoy v. Liddon

189 So. 229, 138 Fla. 297, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1400

DecidedMay 26, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 189 So. 229 (Flournoy v. Liddon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Flournoy v. Liddon, 189 So. 229, 138 Fla. 297, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1400 (Fla. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam. —

The appeal is from decree of foreclosure of chattel mortgage.

The questions attempted to be presented are without merit on the record filed here.

The entire record has been considered and no reversible error appears.

Therefore, the decree is affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur. Chapman, J., concurs in opinion and judgment. Justices Whitfield and Brown not participating as .authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI