Flournoy v. Highlands Hotel Co.

153 S.E. 447, 41 Ga. App. 514, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 968
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 20, 1930·No. 17961·Published

Opinion

Bell, J.

This was a suit to recover on a stock subscription, and, according to the decision in Felton v. Highlands Holel Co., 165 Ga. 598 (14 S. E. 793, 57 A. L. R. 987), the petition affirmatively disclosed such a [515] state of facts as rendered tlie subscription voidable under the securities act. Ga. L. 1920, p. 250. It did not appear from the other facts alleged that the defendant should be estopped to assert this defense. Hee answers to questions certified herein. Flournoy v. Highlands Hotel Co., 170 Ga. 467 (153 S. E. 26). The superior court erred in not sustaining the general demurrer and dismissing the petition.

Decided May 20, 1930. John B. L. Smith, Joseph LeC. Smith, for plaintiff in error. M. G. Bennet, for persons at interest, not parties. H. S. Strozier, Brock, Sparks & Bussell, contra.

Judgment reversed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Flournoy v. Highlands Hotel Co., 153 S.E. 447, 41 Ga. App. 514, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 968 (Ga. Ct. App. 1930).

153 S.E. 447 (Flournoy v. Highlands Hotel Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Felton v. Highlands Hotel Co.
141 S.E. 793 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1928)
Flournoy v. Highlands Hotel Co.
153 S.E. 26 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1930)