Floss v. Culver

863 N.E.2d 615, 113 Ohio St. 3d 198
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 11, 2007
DocketNos. 2006-0505 and 2006-0767
StatusPublished

This text of 863 N.E.2d 615 (Floss v. Culver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Floss v. Culver, 863 N.E.2d 615, 113 Ohio St. 3d 198 (Ohio 2007).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The certified question is answered in the negative and the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Mid-American Fire & Cas. Co. v. Heasley, 113 Ohio St.3d 133, 2007-Ohio-1248, 863 N.E.2d 142.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mid-American Fire & Casualty Co. v. Heasley
113 Ohio St. 3d 133 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
863 N.E.2d 615, 113 Ohio St. 3d 198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/floss-v-culver-ohio-2007.