Floss v. Culver

863 N.E.2d 615, 113 Ohio St. 3d 198
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 11, 2007·No. Nos. 2006-0505 and 2006-0767·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} The certified question is answered in the negative and the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Mid-American Fire & Cas. Co. v. Heasley, 113 Ohio St.3d 133, 2007-Ohio-1248, 863 N.E.2d 142.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Floss v. Culver, 863 N.E.2d 615, 113 Ohio St. 3d 198 (Ohio 2007).

863 N.E.2d 615 (Floss v. Culver) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mid-American Fire & Casualty Co. v. Heasley
113 Ohio St. 3d 133 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2007)