Flory Bros. v. Mancuso

6 Pelt. 387, 1922 La. App. LEXIS 127
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedJune 5, 1922
DocketNo. 8644
StatusPublished

This text of 6 Pelt. 387 (Flory Bros. v. Mancuso) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Flory Bros. v. Mancuso, 6 Pelt. 387, 1922 La. App. LEXIS 127 (La. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

[388]*388On motion to remand.

From a judgment against the plaintiff^thoy have appealsd. Owing to the continued failure of the stenographs^ to deliver the testimony taken by him on the trial of this ms*» and owing to his aubaofpont death* the plaintiff® moved to remand this eu». to the District Court for a new trial*

On the authority of Falcon vs Corona No. 8254 of this Court.

It is ordered that the juApsent of the District Coura heroin be reversed and set aside* and that this ease be maided for .a am trial* all coate to omit the final judgment*

June 5th, 1922.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Pelt. 387, 1922 La. App. LEXIS 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flory-bros-v-mancuso-lactapp-1922.