Florsheim Shoe Store Co. v. Retail Shoe Salesmen's Union
262 A.D. 862, 29 N.Y.S.2d 718, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6285
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Florsheim Shoe Store Co. v. Retail Shoe Salesmen's Union. Read the opinion of the Court — 262 A.D. 769 →
Opinion
Motion for reargument and to continue the injunction herein denied, without costs. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted [see ante, p. 769] and the following question certified: Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action? Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Taylor and Close, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Florsheim Shoe Store Co. v. Retail Shoe Salesmen's Union, 262 A.D. 862, 29 N.Y.S.2d 718, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6285 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).
262 A.D. 862 (Florsheim Shoe Store Co. v. Retail Shoe Salesmen's Union) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.