Florists' Mutual Insurance v. DL&B Enterprises, Inc.

Eleventh Circuit

Florists' Mutual Insurance v. DL&B Enterprises, Inc.

322 F. App'x 729

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedApril 2, 2009

DocketNo. 08-13922

StatusPublished

This text of 322 F. App'x 729 (Florists' Mutual Insurance v. DL&B Enterprises, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Florists' Mutual Insurance v. DL&B Enterprises, Inc., 322 F. App'x 729 (11th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We have held oral argument and carefully considered this case. We agree with the district court that the case presents a close question as to whether DL&B bought goods from LTF, or bought services. We do not reach that issue. Rather, we affirm the judgment of the district court on the basis of the district court’s alternative holding that the damages were speculative. The control field upon which DL&B relies simply does not meet the standard required under Georgia law to prove damages.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

We have held oral argument and carefully considered this case. We agree with the district court that the case presents a close question as to whether DL&B bought goods from LTF, or bought services. We do not reach that issue. Rather, we affirm the judgment of the district court on the basis of the district court’s alternative holding that the damages were speculative. The control field upon which DL&B relies simply does not meet the standard required under Georgia law to prove damages.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

322 F. App'x 729, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florists-mutual-insurance-v-dlb-enterprises-inc-ca11-2009.