Florini v. Stegner

Third Circuit

Florini v. Stegner

82 F.2d 708, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 3089

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided January 29, 1936·No. No. 5901·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the court granting a new trial. Plaintiff had brought suit to recover damages for personal injuries received by him as a result of a collision between the motorcycle which he was riding and a truck owned by defendants. A verdict was returned in favor of the plaintiff. Upon argument, the [709] District Court granted a new trial. The appeal is from such order. No question of bias, prejudice, or arbitrary action is involved.

Our appellate jurisdiction is restricted to reviewing final decisions and to reviewing interlocutory orders or decrees only as are specified in 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 225, 227. An order granting a new trial is not a final decision, since it does not finally determine the rights of the parties. The granting of the new trial obviously does not come within our jurisdiction.

The parties orally asked us to pass on the merits so as to avoid the necessity of a new trial. Being without jurisdiction of the appeal, we are unwilling to act on this oral request, and so restrict ourselves to dismissing it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the court granting a new trial. Plaintiff had brought suit to recover damages for personal injuries received by him as a result of a collision between the motorcycle which he was riding and a truck owned by defendants. A verdict was returned in favor of the plaintiff. Upon argument, the [709] District Court granted a new trial. The appeal is from such order. No question of bias, prejudice, or arbitrary action is involved.

Our appellate jurisdiction is restricted to reviewing final decisions and to reviewing interlocutory orders or decrees only as are specified in 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 225, 227. An order granting a new trial is not a final decision, since it does not finally determine the rights of the parties. The granting of the new trial obviously does not come within our jurisdiction.

The parties orally asked us to pass on the merits so as to avoid the necessity of a new trial. Being without jurisdiction of the appeal, we are unwilling to act on this oral request, and so restrict ourselves to dismissing it.

Florini v. Stegner, 82 F.2d 708, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 3089 (3d Cir. 1936).

Pincite

82 F.2d 708 (Florini v. Stegner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related