Florida Utilities Co. v. Wester

Supreme Court of Florida

Florida Utilities Co. v. Wester

1 So. 2d 561, 146 Fla. 559, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 1189

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedApril 8, 1941

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 So. 2d 561 (Florida Utilities Co. v. Wester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Florida Utilities Co. v. Wester, 1 So. 2d 561, 146 Fla. 559, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 1189 (Fla. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The records and the briefs have been examined and the testimony as to the value of the property destroyed is so indefinite and unsatisfactory, that a majority of the Court have reached the conclusion that the judgment should be reversed for a new trial on the issue of the amount of damages only, no other error being made to appear.

It is so ordered.

Whitfield, Terrell, Chapman and Thomas, J. J., concur. Brown, C. J., Buford-and Adams, J. J., think that no liability is shown and dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The records and the briefs have been examined and the testimony as to the value of the property destroyed is so indefinite and unsatisfactory, that a majority of the Court have reached the conclusion that the judgment should be reversed for a new trial on the issue of the amount of damages only, no other error being made to appear.

It is so ordered.

Whitfield, Terrell, Chapman and Thomas, J. J., concur. Brown, C. J., Buford-and Adams, J. J., think that no liability is shown and dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 So. 2d 561, 146 Fla. 559, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 1189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-utilities-co-v-wester-fla-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack