Florida Title & Abstract Co. v. Nathida, Inc.
91 So. 2d 661
This text of 91 So. 2d 661 (Florida Title & Abstract Co. v. Nathida, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Florida Title & Abstract Co. v. Nathida, Inc., 91 So. 2d 661 (Fla. 1956).
Opinion
■ The decree is affirméd. On the basis of the rule announced in Thomás' v. Thompson, 114 Fla. 833, 155 So.' 321, 'the proof is adequate to meet the requirements of our decision in J. C. Vereen & Sons v.'Houser, 123 Fla. 641, 167 So. 45.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Thomas v. Thompson
155 So. 321 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1934)
J. C. Vereen & Sons, Inc. v. Houser
167 So. 45 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
91 So. 2d 661, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-title-abstract-co-v-nathida-inc-fla-1956.