Florida Steel Corp. v. Keough

433 So. 2d 1025, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20731
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 15, 1983·No. No. AN-492·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In a detailed and persuasive order the deputy found that claimant had suffered a fifty percent loss in wage-earning capacity. §§ 440.02(9) and 440.15(3)(u), Fla.Stat. (1977). The issue being close and having been thoroughly contested before the deputy, we defer to his essentially factual determination. See Woodard v. Dade County Board of Public Instruction, 278 So.2d 620 (Fla.1973); Walker v. Electronic Products & Engineering Co., 248 So.2d 161 (Fla.1971); Kurtz v. Wall, 182 So.2d 618 (Fla.1966); Guzman v. Surge Electric, Inc., 381 So.2d 287 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).

AFFIRMED.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., C.J., and WENTWORTH and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Florida Steel Corp. v. Keough, 433 So. 2d 1025, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20731 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

433 So. 2d 1025 (Florida Steel Corp. v. Keough) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Woodard v. Dade County Board of Public Instruction
278 So. 2d 620 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1973)
Guzman v. SURGE ELEC., INC.
381 So. 2d 287 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Kurtz v. Wall
182 So. 2d 618 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1966)