Florida State Hospital v. Heatrice

535 So. 2d 619, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2653, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5460, 1988 WL 130072
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 8, 1988·No. No. 88-694·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal of an order finding claimant suffered a permanent impairment following injuries received in a work accident. After careful consideration, we affirm that ruling. However, we remand for the sole purpose of allowing the deputy commissioner to take further evidence to assign a permanent impairment rating in accordance with Section 440.-15(3)(a) 1 a-b, Florida Statutes (1987). Racz v. Chennault, Inc. 418 So.2d 413 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Deinema v. Pierpoint Condominiums, 415 So.2d 811 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Trindade v. Abbey Road Beef ’N Booze, 443 So.2d 1007, 1011 n. 4 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).

ERVIN, BOOTH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Florida State Hospital v. Heatrice, 535 So. 2d 619, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2653, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5460, 1988 WL 130072 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

535 So. 2d 619 (Florida State Hospital v. Heatrice) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

CHINA PROD. NW, INC. v. DJ Broesamle Co.
535 So. 2d 619 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)