Florida State Hospital v. Heatrice

535 So. 2d 619, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2653, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5460, 1988 WL 130072
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 8, 1988
DocketNo. 88-694
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 535 So. 2d 619 (Florida State Hospital v. Heatrice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Florida State Hospital v. Heatrice, 535 So. 2d 619, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2653, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5460, 1988 WL 130072 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal of an order finding claimant suffered a permanent impairment following injuries received in a work accident. After careful consideration, we affirm that ruling. However, we remand for the sole purpose of allowing the deputy commissioner to take further evidence to assign a permanent impairment rating in accordance with Section 440.-15(3)(a) 1 a-b, Florida Statutes (1987). Racz v. Chennault, Inc. 418 So.2d 413 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Deinema v. Pierpoint Condominiums, 415 So.2d 811 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Trindade v. Abbey Road Beef ’N Booze, 443 So.2d 1007, 1011 n. 4 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).

ERVIN, BOOTH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

CHINA PROD. NW, INC. v. DJ Broesamle Co.
535 So. 2d 619 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
535 So. 2d 619, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2653, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5460, 1988 WL 130072, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-state-hospital-v-heatrice-fladistctapp-1988.