Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Florida Production Engineering v. Lowd

Florida Production Engineering v. Lowd

559 So. 2d 330, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2337, 1990 WL 39861
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 3, 1990
DocketNo. 89-1859
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 559 So. 2d 330 (Florida Production Engineering v. Lowd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Florida Production Engineering v. Lowd, 559 So. 2d 330, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2337, 1990 WL 39861 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Although we find the employer/carrier (e/c) received proper notice, we find that the JCC erred in holding the second e/c solely responsible for coverage of the claimant’s present condition. Because no competent substantial evidence supports the JCC’s finding and because all testimony indicates the injury resulted from an aggravation of a preexisting injury, we reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. See Oaks Farm v. Berry, 500 So.2d 175 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).

BOOTH, THOMPSON and MINER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jacksonville Transp. Auth. v. ASC ASSOCS.
559 So. 2d 330 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
559 So. 2d 330, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2337, 1990 WL 39861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-production-engineering-v-lowd-fladistctapp-1990.