Florida Production Engineering v. Lowd
559 So. 2d 330, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2337, 1990 WL 39861
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 3, 1990·No. No. 89-1859·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Although we find the employer/carrier (e/c) received proper notice, we find that the JCC erred in holding the second e/c solely responsible for coverage of the claimant’s present condition. Because no competent substantial evidence supports the JCC’s finding and because all testimony indicates the injury resulted from an aggravation of a preexisting injury, we reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. See Oaks Farm v. Berry, 500 So.2d 175 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Florida Production Engineering v. Lowd, 559 So. 2d 330, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2337, 1990 WL 39861 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).
559 So. 2d 330 (Florida Production Engineering v. Lowd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jacksonville Transp. Auth. v. ASC ASSOCS.
559 So. 2d 330 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)