Florida Power Corp. v. Baker

410 So. 2d 179, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19154
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 9, 1982·No. No. AC-7·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this workers’ compensation order, we affirm as to all points raised except the portion of the attorney’s fee award based on the time the claimant’s attorney spent in preparation and presentation of his claim for an attorney’s fee, which is clearly not awardable. See Osceola Petroleum Co. v. Heard, IRC Order 2-3347 (February 13, 1978). Therefore, this cause is remanded so that the deputy commissioner can accordingly reduce the attorney’s fee award.

McCORD, ERVIN and SHAW, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Florida Power Corp. v. Baker, 410 So. 2d 179, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19154 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

410 So. 2d 179 (Florida Power Corp. v. Baker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Tampa v. Fein
438 So. 2d 442 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Layne Atlantic Co. v. Scott
415 So. 2d 837 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Langston v. King
410 So. 2d 179 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)