Florida Parole Commission v. Shiloh

906 So. 2d 313, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 8019, 2005 WL 1249217
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 27, 2005
DocketNo. 2D04-3191
StatusPublished

This text of 906 So. 2d 313 (Florida Parole Commission v. Shiloh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Florida Parole Commission v. Shiloh, 906 So. 2d 313, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 8019, 2005 WL 1249217 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

SALCINES, Judge.

The Florida Parole Commission seeks review of the circuit court’s order granting Adrian Shiloh’s petition for writ of prohibition with respect to the Parole Commission’s warrant for his arrest for a violation of his conditional release supervision.1 The circuit court essentially found that Shiloh could not simultaneously be on conditional release2 and civilly committed under the Jimmy Ryce Act.3 In Parole Commission v. Smith, 896 So.2d 966 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005), this court determined that a defendant can be under conditional release supervision while detained at a civil commitment center. Accordingly, we convert this matter to a direct appeal and reverse.

Reversed.

SILBERMAN and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

PAROLE COM'N v. Smith
896 So. 2d 966 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
David v. Meadows
881 So. 2d 653 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
906 So. 2d 313, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 8019, 2005 WL 1249217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-parole-commission-v-shiloh-fladistctapp-2005.