Florida Orange Hedge Fence Co. v. A. G. Branham & Co.

32 Fla. 289
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 15, 1893
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 32 Fla. 289 (Florida Orange Hedge Fence Co. v. A. G. Branham & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Florida Orange Hedge Fence Co. v. A. G. Branham & Co., 32 Fla. 289 (Fla. 1893).

Opinion

Raney, C. J. :

Defendants in error move to vacate the supersedeas on the ground that the sureties, J. H. Smith and C. A. Boone, on the supersedeas bond filed herein have become insolvent since the aproval of such bond. The affidavits filed in support of the motion establish the alleged change in the condition of the sureties; and under the circumstances the defendants in error are entitled to have the protection of new and solvent sureties, and unless the plaintiff in error shall within fifteen days file another bond properly conditioned, with good and sufficient sereties according to law, an order will be made vacating the supersedeas. Williams vs. Claflin, 103 U. S., 753; Jerome vs. McCarter, 21 Wall., 17.

It will be ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. James H. Price & Co.
235 So. 2d 763 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Stegemann v. Emery
137 So. 888 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)
Wall v. Woods
238 P. 527 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1925)
American Brewing Co. v. Talbot
36 S.W. 657 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1896)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 Fla. 289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-orange-hedge-fence-co-v-a-g-branham-co-fla-1893.