Florida National Properties, Inc. v. City of Coral Springs

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Florida National Properties, Inc. v. City of Coral Springs

619 So. 2d 462, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6148, 1993 WL 191981

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 9, 1993

DocketNo. 92-1775

StatusPublished

This text of 619 So. 2d 462 (Florida National Properties, Inc. v. City of Coral Springs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Florida National Properties, Inc. v. City of Coral Springs, 619 So. 2d 462, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6148, 1993 WL 191981 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The City of Coral Springs, by resolution, required Florida National Properties, Inc., to execute a contract denominated as a “Private Streets Agreement.” This contract was a necessary condition precedent [463]*463to the city’s issuance of certain building permits and plat approvals in a Florida National residential development. Florida National brought suit for declaratory relief, suffered an adverse final judgment at the trial court level, and appeals.

The issue is whether it was appropriate for the city to impose conditions on the approval of a plat and the subsequent issuance of building permits by resolution rather than by ordinance. We hold that it was not and reverse. Cf Barry v. Garcia, 573 So.2d 932, 938-39 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 583 So.2d 1034 (Fla.1991). We do not reach the question of whether such conditions contained in a properly enacted ordinance would pass constitutional muster, nor do we consider the additional points on appeal.

We remand for further appropriate proceedings.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ANSTEAD, HERSEY and KLEIN, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The City of Coral Springs, by resolution, required Florida National Properties, Inc., to execute a contract denominated as a “Private Streets Agreement.” This contract was a necessary condition precedent [463]*463to the city’s issuance of certain building permits and plat approvals in a Florida National residential development. Florida National brought suit for declaratory relief, suffered an adverse final judgment at the trial court level, and appeals.

The issue is whether it was appropriate for the city to impose conditions on the approval of a plat and the subsequent issuance of building permits by resolution rather than by ordinance. We hold that it was not and reverse. Cf Barry v. Garcia, 573 So.2d 932, 938-39 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 583 So.2d 1034 (Fla.1991). We do not reach the question of whether such conditions contained in a properly enacted ordinance would pass constitutional muster, nor do we consider the additional points on appeal.

We remand for further appropriate proceedings.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ANSTEAD, HERSEY and KLEIN, JJ„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

619 So. 2d 462, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6148, 1993 WL 191981, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-national-properties-inc-v-city-of-coral-springs-fladistctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack