Florida Motor Lines, Inc. v. Newsham

132 So. 839, 101 Fla. 1072
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 5, 1931·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

The plaintiffs below were riding with friends in an automobile, the husband being' on the front seat with the driver who owned the car, the wife and two other ladies were on the rear seat, all being guests of the owner and driver of the car on a pleasure ride. At *1073 a crossing a motor bus collided with the ear and the wife was injured.

In an action by the husband and wife for personal injuries to the wife judgment was rendered against the defendant motor company in favor of the husband for one amount and in favor of the wife for a different and much larger amount. A writ of error was taken by the defendant. The verdict does not cleanly reflect the probative effect of the evidence. The damages awarded to the wife appear to be excessive in view of all the evidence as to her injury; and there was substantial evidence tending to show contributory negligence of the husband which if established would bar recovery by him. See T. & G. C. v. Lynch, 91 Fla. 375, 108 So. 560. In this state of the record a new trial should be granted.

Reversed.

Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Ellis and Terrell, J.J., concur. Brown, J., concurs specially.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Florida Motor Lines, Inc. v. Newsham, 132 So. 839, 101 Fla. 1072 (Fla. 1931).

132 So. 839 (Florida Motor Lines, Inc. v. Newsham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Connell v. Petri
30 So. 2d 922 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1947)
State Ex Rel. Woman's Catholic Order v. City of Fort Myers
196 So. 705 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1940)
Pendarvis v. Pfeifer
182 So. 307 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)