Florida Mining & Materials v. Holley

677 So. 2d 997, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8650, 1996 WL 455562
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 14, 1996·No. No. 95-4026·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

REVERSED AND REMANDED. The order setting the amount of the attorney’s fee is facially insufficient. See Metric Constructors, Inc. v. Boyles, 633 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). We remand for additional findings as required by section 440.34, Florida Statutes. See Barco Vending Co. v. Villalonga, 608 So.2d 128 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Dobbs v. Suncoast Acoustics, 590 So.2d 7 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

KAHN, DAVIS and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Florida Mining & Materials v. Holley, 677 So. 2d 997, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8650, 1996 WL 455562 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

677 So. 2d 997 (Florida Mining & Materials v. Holley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dobbs v. Suncoast Acoustics
590 So. 2d 7 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Barco Vending Co. v. Villalonga
608 So. 2d 128 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Metric Constructors, Inc. v. Boyles
633 So. 2d 1167 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)