Florida Mining & Materials v. Holley

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Florida Mining & Materials v. Holley

677 So. 2d 997, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8650, 1996 WL 455562

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 14, 1996

DocketNo. 95-4026

StatusPublished

This text of 677 So. 2d 997 (Florida Mining & Materials v. Holley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Florida Mining & Materials v. Holley, 677 So. 2d 997, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8650, 1996 WL 455562 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

REVERSED AND REMANDED. The order setting the amount of the attorney’s fee is facially insufficient. See Metric Constructors, Inc. v. Boyles, 633 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). We remand for additional findings as required by section 440.34, Florida Statutes. See Barco Vending Co. v. Villalonga, 608 So.2d 128 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Dobbs v. Suncoast Acoustics, 590 So.2d 7 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

KAHN, DAVIS and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

REVERSED AND REMANDED. The order setting the amount of the attorney’s fee is facially insufficient. See Metric Constructors, Inc. v. Boyles, 633 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). We remand for additional findings as required by section 440.34, Florida Statutes. See Barco Vending Co. v. Villalonga, 608 So.2d 128 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Dobbs v. Suncoast Acoustics, 590 So.2d 7 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

KAHN, DAVIS and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

677 So. 2d 997, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8650, 1996 WL 455562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-mining-materials-v-holley-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack