Florida Limousine Service, Inc. v. Bevis
304 So. 2d 105, 1974 Fla. LEXIS 4119
Opinions
Our careful considerations and analyses of the several petitions, the records briefs and arguments of counsel in these consolidated cases sustain the view that the findings of the Commission are supported by competent substantial evidence and that in entering its orders Respondent Commission met the essential requirements of law.
Accordingly the several petitions for writ of certiorari herein are
Denied.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Florida Limousine Service, Inc. v. Bevis, 304 So. 2d 105, 1974 Fla. LEXIS 4119 (Fla. 1974).
304 So. 2d 105 (Florida Limousine Service, Inc. v. Bevis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Southern Armored Service, Inc. v. Mason
167 So. 2d 848 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1964)
Fleet Transport Co. of Florida v. Mason
188 So. 2d 294 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1966)
Turf Express, Inc. v. Mason
204 So. 2d 730 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1967)
Camp Lumber Co. v. Yarborough
262 So. 2d 649 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1972)
Daytona Beach Limousine Service, Inc. v. Yarborough
267 So. 2d 11 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1972)