Florida Land & Fruit Co. v. Hagan

75 Fla. 826
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 3, 1918·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having been submitted to the Court at a former term thereof upon the transcript of the record of the order and decree aforesaid, and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the [827]*827said order and decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order and decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

Taylor, Whitfield, Ellis and West, J. J., concur. Browne, C. J., took no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Florida Land & Fruit Co. v. Hagan, 75 Fla. 826 (Fla. 1918).

75 Fla. 826 (Florida Land & Fruit Co. v. Hagan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.