Florida Keys Electric Cooperative Ass'n v. A & G Blaton of Florida, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Florida Keys Electric Cooperative Ass'n v. A & G Blaton of Florida, Inc.

574 So. 2d 1225, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1479, 1991 WL 22570

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 26, 1991

DocketNo. 90-2168

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 574 So. 2d 1225 (Florida Keys Electric Cooperative Ass'n v. A & G Blaton of Florida, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Florida Keys Electric Cooperative Ass'n v. A & G Blaton of Florida, Inc., 574 So. 2d 1225, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1479, 1991 WL 22570 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals a final order dismissing its amended complaint, and an order taxing costs against it, on appellant’s action for breach of a construction contract. Appellees cross-appeal from an order denying their motion for attorney’s fees pursuant to section 57.105(1), Florida Statutes (1989). We affirm the orders dismissing appellant’s complaint and taxing costs based on a ruling that the parties had entered into a contract with a valid and binding arbitration clause. See Sabates v. International Medical Centers, Inc., 450 So.2d 514 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Collier Land Corporation v. Royal Palm Beach Realty, Inc., 338 So.2d 859 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976), cert. denied, 348 So.2d 945 (Fla.1977).

We also affirm the order denying appel-lees' motion for attorney’s fees based upon a holding that there was not a complete absence of a justiciable issue raised by appellant’s complaint. § 57.105(1), Fla. Stat. (1989); Muckenfuss v. Deltona Corporation, 508 So.2d 340 (Fla.1987); Personnel One, Inc. v. John Sommerer & Company, P.A., 564 So.2d 1217 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals a final order dismissing its amended complaint, and an order taxing costs against it, on appellant’s action for breach of a construction contract. Appellees cross-appeal from an order denying their motion for attorney’s fees pursuant to section 57.105(1), Florida Statutes (1989). We affirm the orders dismissing appellant’s complaint and taxing costs based on a ruling that the parties had entered into a contract with a valid and binding arbitration clause. See Sabates v. International Medical Centers, Inc., 450 So.2d 514 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Collier Land Corporation v. Royal Palm Beach Realty, Inc., 338 So.2d 859 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976), cert. denied, 348 So.2d 945 (Fla.1977).

We also affirm the order denying appel-lees' motion for attorney’s fees based upon a holding that there was not a complete absence of a justiciable issue raised by appellant’s complaint. § 57.105(1), Fla. Stat. (1989); Muckenfuss v. Deltona Corporation, 508 So.2d 340 (Fla.1987); Personnel One, Inc. v. John Sommerer & Company, P.A., 564 So.2d 1217 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

574 So. 2d 1225, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1479, 1991 WL 22570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-keys-electric-cooperative-assn-v-a-g-blaton-of-florida-inc-fladistctapp-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack