Florida Key Citizens Coalition, Inc. v. Florida Administration Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Florida Key Citizens Coalition, Inc. v. Florida Administration Commission

947 So. 2d 493, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 19119

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 15, 2006

DocketNo. 3D05-1800

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 947 So. 2d 493 (Florida Key Citizens Coalition, Inc. v. Florida Administration Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Florida Key Citizens Coalition, Inc. v. Florida Administration Commission, 947 So. 2d 493, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 19119 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Florida Keys Citizens Coalition, Inc., and Last Stand, Inc., (collectively “petitioners”), appeal the Administrative Law Judge’s, (“ALJ”), order rejecting a challenge to proposed rules amending comprehensive plans and land development regulations. Petitioners contend that the proposed rules are invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority. We disagree and affirm.

The ALJ properly conducted a de novo review of the petitioners’ challenge to the proposed rules. We find that a preponderance of evidence supported the ALJ’s findings that the proposed rules were valid exercises of legislative authority and not arbitrary and capricious. See Dep’t of Health v. Merritt, 919 So.2d 561 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006); Chanty v. Fla. State. Univ., 680 So.2d 463 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Dep’t of Natural Res. v. Sailfish Club of Fla., Inc., 473 So.2d 261, 264 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). Accordingly, we affirm the ALJ’s final order.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Florida Keys Citizens Coalition, Inc., and Last Stand, Inc., (collectively “petitioners”), appeal the Administrative Law Judge’s, (“ALJ”), order rejecting a challenge to proposed rules amending comprehensive plans and land development regulations. Petitioners contend that the proposed rules are invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority. We disagree and affirm.

The ALJ properly conducted a de novo review of the petitioners’ challenge to the proposed rules. We find that a preponderance of evidence supported the ALJ’s findings that the proposed rules were valid exercises of legislative authority and not arbitrary and capricious. See Dep’t of Health v. Merritt, 919 So.2d 561 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006); Chanty v. Fla. State. Univ., 680 So.2d 463 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Dep’t of Natural Res. v. Sailfish Club of Fla., Inc., 473 So.2d 261, 264 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). Accordingly, we affirm the ALJ’s final order.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

947 So. 2d 493, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 19119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-key-citizens-coalition-inc-v-florida-administration-commission-fladistctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack