Florida Industrial Commission v. Neal

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Florida Industrial Commission v. Neal

204 So. 2d 242

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 21, 1967

DocketNo. J-149

StatusPublished

This text of 204 So. 2d 242 (Florida Industrial Commission v. Neal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Florida Industrial Commission v. Neal, 204 So. 2d 242 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an interlocutory appeal from an order denying appellants’ motion to dismiss the complaint filed by appellee for a declaratory decree. Our examination of the complaint persuades us to the view that the complaint states sufficient facts entitling appellee to a declaration of its rights under the Statute involved in the case. For this reason we hold that the trial court did not commit error in refusing to dismiss it. Whether appellee is entitled to the relief prayed in her complaint had not yet been decided by the trial court and our affirmance of its action shall not be construed in any manner as an adjudication of the merits of the controversy alleged.

Interlocutory appeal dismissed.

WIGGINTON, C. J„ and CARROLL, DONALD K., and RAWLS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an interlocutory appeal from an order denying appellants’ motion to dismiss the complaint filed by appellee for a declaratory decree. Our examination of the complaint persuades us to the view that the complaint states sufficient facts entitling appellee to a declaration of its rights under the Statute involved in the case. For this reason we hold that the trial court did not commit error in refusing to dismiss it. Whether appellee is entitled to the relief prayed in her complaint had not yet been decided by the trial court and our affirmance of its action shall not be construed in any manner as an adjudication of the merits of the controversy alleged.

Interlocutory appeal dismissed.

WIGGINTON, C. J„ and CARROLL, DONALD K., and RAWLS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

204 So. 2d 242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-industrial-commission-v-neal-fladistctapp-1967.