FLORIDA GRAND OPERA v. Montes

7 So. 3d 1158, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 4304, 2009 WL 1231007
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 7, 2009·No. 1D09-0107·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. See Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Carter, 680 So.2d 546, 547 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) (holding “the time, trouble, and expense of an unnecessary trial is not ‘irreparable harm’ when determining whether the threshold elements of certiorari jurisdiction have been met”). Cf. Weinstein v. Aisenberg, 758 So.2d 705 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (holding a claim for money damages is an adequate remedy at law and so it does not provide a sufficient basis for injunctive relief, “notwithstanding the possibility that a money judgment will be uncollectible”).

BARFIELD, THOMAS, and CLARK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FLORIDA GRAND OPERA v. Montes, 7 So. 3d 1158, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 4304, 2009 WL 1231007 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

7 So. 3d 1158 (FLORIDA GRAND OPERA v. Montes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Carter
680 So. 2d 546 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Weinstein v. Aisenberg
758 So. 2d 705 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)