Florida Finance Co. v. Hastings

41 Fla. 469
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 15, 1899·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam :

This cause coming on to be heard upon motion of the appellee, appearing specially to dismiss the appeal, and it appearing to the court that the entry of appeal is fatally defective, in that it specifies no return day to which the appeal is taken, and, therefore, that the constructive notice furnished by the record of said entry of appeal does not notify the appellee of any definite time at which she is to appear therein before the appellate court, the said appeal is hereby dismissed at the cost of the appellants. State ex rel. Andreu v. Canfield, 40 Fla. 36, 23 South. Rep. 591; Garrison v. Parsons, 41 Fla. —, 25 South. Rep. 336.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Florida Finance Co. v. Hastings, 41 Fla. 469 (Fla. 1899).

41 Fla. 469 (Florida Finance Co. v. Hastings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Andreu v. Canfield
40 Fla. 36 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1898)