Florida Fertilizer Co. v. Johnson
This text of 202 So. 2d 846 (Florida Fertilizer Co. v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By petition and cross-petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date May 19, 1967.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition and the cross-petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition and cross-petition are therefore denied.
The attorney for the claimant-respondent on the petition for certiorari is allowed a fee of $250.00 for his services in this Court. Application for fees on the cross-petition is denied.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
202 So. 2d 846, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-fertilizer-co-v-johnson-fla-1967.