Florida Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Government Employees Insurance Co.

339 So. 2d 718
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 2, 1976·No. No. BB-199·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM-.

Appellant appeals a final summary judgment entered in favor of appellee. Our examination of the record reveals the existence of issues of material facts which could not be properly resolved by summary judgment. (Please see Connell v. Sledge, Fla.App. 1st 1975, 306 So.2d 194; Forrest v. Carter, Fla.App. 1st 1975, 308 So.2d 141; Delany v. Breeding’s Homestead Drug Co., Sup.Ct.Fla.1957, 93 So.2d 116; Holl v. Talcott, Sup.Ct.Fla.1966, 191 So.2d 40 and Westinghouse Elec. Sup. Co. v. Midway Shop. Mall, Inc., Fla.App. 3rd 1973, 277 So.2d 809). The summary final judgment here appealed is therefore

REVERSED.

BOYER, C. J., and McCORD and MILLS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Florida Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Government Employees Insurance Co., 339 So. 2d 718 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

339 So. 2d 718 (Florida Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Government Employees Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morpurgo v. Greyhound Rent-A-Car, Inc.
339 So. 2d 718 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)