Florida Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. Zarahn

666 So. 2d 1034, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 469, 1996 WL 27889
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 26, 1996
DocketNo. 94-3935
StatusPublished

This text of 666 So. 2d 1034 (Florida Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. Zarahn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Florida Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. Zarahn, 666 So. 2d 1034, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 469, 1996 WL 27889 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

VAN NORTWICK, Judge.

Florida Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company appeals a final judgment ruling that the provisions of section 627.727(6), Florida Statutes (Supp.1992), are procedural and apply to the instant cause of action filed by Joyce C. Zarahn, as mother and next friend of Shawnda Zarahn, a minor, appel-lees, even though it arose prior to the effective date of the 1992 amendment to the statute. For the reasons and authority thoroughly discussed in State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Hassen, 650 So.2d 128 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995), rev. granted, 662 So.2d 932 (Fla.1995), we agree with our colleagues on the Second District that the 1992 amendment to section 627.727(6) “substantially alters the landscape of uninsured motorist law,” id. at 139, and, therefore “is a substantive law that cannot be applied to a pending uninsured motorist claim based on an insurance contract predating the statute without diminishing the value of that contract.” Id. Accordingly, we reverse. As the court in Hassen, we certify the following two-part question as involving issues of great public importance:

IS SECTION 627.727(6), FLORIDA STATUTES (SUPP.1992), CONSTITUTIONAL? IF SO, IS IT A SUBSTANTIVE STATUTE, AS OPPOSED TO A REMEDIAL STATUTE, SUCH THAT ITS TERMS CANNOT BE APPLIED CONSTITUTIONALLY TO A PENDING CLAIM BROUGHT UNDER THE UNINSURED MOTORIST PROVISIONS OF AN AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE POLICY ISSUED PRIOR TO ITS EFFECTIVE DATE?

JOANOS and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Hassen
650 So. 2d 128 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
666 So. 2d 1034, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 469, 1996 WL 27889, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-farm-bureau-mutual-insurance-co-v-zarahn-fladistctapp-1996.