Florida ex rel. Shevin v. M & W Theatres, Inc.

Supreme Court

Florida ex rel. Shevin v. M & W Theatres, Inc.

413 U.S. 903, 93 S. Ct. 3026, 37 L. Ed. 2d 1014, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 1934

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJune 25, 1973

DocketNo. 70-10

StatusPublished

This text of 413 U.S. 903 (Florida ex rel. Shevin v. M & W Theatres, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Florida ex rel. Shevin v. M & W Theatres, Inc., 413 U.S. 903, 93 S. Ct. 3026, 37 L. Ed. 2d 1014, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 1934 (1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from D. C. N. D. Fla. Judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of Miller v. California, ante, p. 15; Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, ante, p. 49; Kaplan v. California, ante, p. 115; United States v. 12 200-ft. Reels Film, ante, p. 123; United States v. Orito, ante, p. 139; Heller v. New York, ante, p. 483; Roaden v. Kentucky, ante, p. 496; and Alexander v. Virginia, ante, p. 836.

Mr. Justice Douglas would vacate the judgment and remand case to determine whether after a delay of over three years the case is moot. Mr. Justice Brennan, joined by Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice Marshall, would vacate the judgment and remand case for further proceedings not inconsistent with his dissent in Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, ante, p. 73. See Miller v. California, ante, p. 47.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from D. C. N. D. Fla. Judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of Miller v. California, ante, p. 15; Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, ante, p. 49; Kaplan v. California, ante, p. 115; United States v. 12 200-ft. Reels Film, ante, p. 123; United States v. Orito, ante, p. 139; Heller v. New York, ante, p. 483; Roaden v. Kentucky, ante, p. 496; and Alexander v. Virginia, ante, p. 836.

Mr. Justice Douglas would vacate the judgment and remand case to determine whether after a delay of over three years the case is moot. Mr. Justice Brennan, joined by Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice Marshall, would vacate the judgment and remand case for further proceedings not inconsistent with his dissent in Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, ante, p. 73. See Miller v. California, ante, p. 47.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

413 U.S. 903, 93 S. Ct. 3026, 37 L. Ed. 2d 1014, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 1934, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-ex-rel-shevin-v-m-w-theatres-inc-scotus-1973.