Florida Ex Rel. Hawkins v. Board of Control of Fla.

350 U.S. 413, 76 S. Ct. 464, 100 L. Ed. 2d 486, 1956 U.S. LEXIS 1290
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 23, 1956
Docket624
StatusPublished
Cited by37 cases

This text of 350 U.S. 413 (Florida Ex Rel. Hawkins v. Board of Control of Fla.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Florida Ex Rel. Hawkins v. Board of Control of Fla., 350 U.S. 413, 76 S. Ct. 464, 100 L. Ed. 2d 486, 1956 U.S. LEXIS 1290 (1956).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petition for certiorari is denied.

On May 24, 1954, we issued a mandate in this case to the Supreme Court of Florida. 347 U. S. 971. We directed that the case be reconsidered in light of our decision in the Segregation Cases decided May 17, 1954, Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U. S. 483. In doing so, we did not imply that decrees involving graduate study present the problems of public elementary and secondary schools. We had theretofore, in three cases, ordered the admission of Negro applicants to graduate schools without discrimination because of color. Sweatt v. Painter, 339 U. S. 629; Sipuel v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, 332 U. S. 631; cf. McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education, 339 U. S. 637. Thus, our second decision in the Brown case, 349 U. S. 294, which implemented the earlier one, had no application to a case involving a Negro applying for *414 admission to a state law school. Accordingly, the mandate of May 24, 1954, is recalled and is vacated. In lieu thereof, the following order is entered:

Per Curiam: The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded on the authority of the Segregation Cases decided May 17,1954, Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U. S. 483. As this case involves the admission of a Negro to a graduate professional school, there is no reason for delay. He is entitled to prompt admission under the rules and regulations applicable to other qualified candidates. Sweatt v. Painter, 339 U. S. 629; Sipuel v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, 332 U. S. 631; cf. McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education, 339 U. S. 637.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

107oag140
Maryland Attorney General Reports, 2022
Maryland Attorney General Opinion 107oag140
Maryland Attorney General Reports, 2022
United States v. State of La.
815 F. Supp. 947 (E.D. Louisiana, 1993)
United States v. Louisiana
815 F. Supp. 947 (E.D. Louisiana, 1993)
Foster v. State
614 So. 2d 455 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
United States v. Fordice
505 U.S. 717 (Supreme Court, 1992)
Knight v. State of Ala.
787 F. Supp. 1030 (N.D. Alabama, 1991)
The Florida Bar
532 So. 2d 669 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
Ayers v. Allain
674 F. Supp. 1523 (N.D. Mississippi, 1987)
Geier v. University of Tennessee
597 F.2d 1056 (Sixth Circuit, 1979)
Berry v. School Dist. of City of Benton Harbor
467 F. Supp. 721 (W.D. Michigan, 1978)
In Re Florida Bd. of Bar Examiners
339 So. 2d 637 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1976)
Geier v. Dunn
337 F. Supp. 573 (M.D. Tennessee, 1972)
Norris v. State Council of Higher Education
327 F. Supp. 1368 (E.D. Virginia, 1971)
Mapp v. Board of Education
319 F.2d 571 (Sixth Circuit, 1963)
Watson v. City of Memphis
373 U.S. 526 (Supreme Court, 1963)
Meredith v. Fair
305 F.2d 343 (Fifth Circuit, 1962)
Bush v. Orleans Parish School Board
205 F. Supp. 893 (E.D. Louisiana, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
350 U.S. 413, 76 S. Ct. 464, 100 L. Ed. 2d 486, 1956 U.S. LEXIS 1290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-ex-rel-hawkins-v-board-of-control-of-fla-scotus-1956.