Florida ex rel. Colston v. Crawford
Opinion
Petitioners are fathers held in contempt, and jailed, by a Florida state court for failures to pay child support. They appealed, alleging that they are indigents and that there were constitutional deficiencies in the contempt hearing. They then filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in federal [473]*473court, seeking an order releasing them on bail pending the state court appeal.1 The district court dismissed the petition.
On April 15, 1983 the state court appeal was decided by the Third District Court of Appeals for the State of Florida, which held that the contempt proceedings deprived petitioners (and others) of due process and reversed the contempt orders with directions concerning proper hearings. Robbins v. Robbins, 429 So.2d 424 (and other cases).2
There being no further issue of right to bail pending the state court appeal, this appeal from the denial of the writ is moot. The judgment of the district court is VACATED and the cause is REMANDED to the district court with instructions to dismiss the case as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
707 F.2d 472 (Florida ex rel. Colston v. Crawford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.