Florida Eastern Properties, Inc. v. Southeast Commercial Developers, Inc.
479 So. 2d 793, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2574, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16987
Opinion
Based upon this court’s reading of Conklin v. Hurley, 428 So.2d 654 (Fla.1983), we affirm. However, we certify the following question to the Florida Supreme Court as being of great public importance pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(a)(2)(A)(v):
DO IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF FITNESS AND MERCHANTABILITY EXTEND TO FIRST PURCHASERS FROM DEVELOPERS OF REAL ESTATE WITH COMMERCIAL STRUCTURES ON THE LAND?
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Florida Eastern Properties, Inc. v. Southeast Commercial Developers, Inc., 479 So. 2d 793, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2574, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16987 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).
479 So. 2d 793 (Florida Eastern Properties, Inc. v. Southeast Commercial Developers, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Conklin v. Hurley
428 So. 2d 654 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1983)