Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. Vick
This text of 162 So. 2d 314 (Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. Vick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant railway company, the defendant below, has appealed from an adverse judgment based on a jury verdict in a case arising out of a railroad crossing collision between a train and an automobile. Appellant states and argues three points dealing with admission of evidence, one of which also concerns comments of counsel in argument to the jury. On consideration thereof in the light of the briefs and record we conclude that the case was fully and fairly tried, and no reversible error has been made to appear.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
162 So. 2d 314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-east-coast-railway-co-v-vick-fladistctapp-1964.