Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. Urolia

147 So. 585, 109 Fla. 384
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 10, 1933·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been s'een and inspected, and the Court now being advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed. F. E. C. Ry. Co. v. Carter, 67 Fla. 335, 65 Sou. Rep. 254.

Affirmed.

Davis, C. J., and Terrell, and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. Urolia, 147 So. 585, 109 Fla. 384 (Fla. 1933).

147 So. 585 (Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. Urolia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. Carter
65 So. 254 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1914)