Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. Stager

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. Stager

189 So. 2d 194

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 2, 1966

DocketNo. 66-118

StatusPublished

This text of 189 So. 2d 194 (Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. Stager) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. Stager, 189 So. 2d 194 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

HENDRY, Chief Judge.

The issues raised by the petition for writ of certiorari were decided in our decision filed on this date, August 2, 1966, Stager v. Florida East Coast Railway Company, Fla.App.1966, 189 So.2d 192.

Certiorari does not lie to review an order if. there is any other adequate remedy. Fort v. Fort, Fla.App.1958, 104 So.2d 69.

Accordingly, petition for writ of certio-rari is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HENDRY, Chief Judge.

The issues raised by the petition for writ of certiorari were decided in our decision filed on this date, August 2, 1966, Stager v. Florida East Coast Railway Company, Fla.App.1966, 189 So.2d 192.

Certiorari does not lie to review an order if. there is any other adequate remedy. Fort v. Fort, Fla.App.1958, 104 So.2d 69.

Accordingly, petition for writ of certio-rari is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

189 So. 2d 194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-east-coast-railway-co-v-stager-fladistctapp-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack