Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. Hazel
43 Fla. 599
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. Hazel. Read the opinion of the Court — 43 Fla. 263 →
Opinion
This action was brought by the defendant in error against plaintiff in error. There was judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendant takes writ of error. The judgment is affirmed. The motion of counsel for defendant in error for the allowance of an attorney fee for defending the suit in this court is denied.
Decision Per Curiam.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. Hazel, 43 Fla. 599 (Fla. 1901).
43 Fla. 599 (Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. Hazel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.