Florida Department of Transportation v. Hogan
780 So. 2d 905, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 98, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 332, 2001 WL 169612
Opinion
We have for review a decision on the following question of great public importance certified by the First District Court of Appeal in Department of Transportation v. Hogan, 777 So.2d 976 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999):
WHERE AN EMPLOYER TAKES A WORKERS’ COMPENSATION OFFSET UNDER SECTION 440.20(15), FLORIDA STATUTES (1985), AND INITIALLY INCLUDES SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFITS PAID UNDER SECTION 440.15(l)(e)(l), FLORIDA STATUTES (1985), IS THE EMPLOYER ENTITLED TO RECALCULATE THE OFFSET BASED ON THE YEARLY 5% INCREASE IN SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFITS?
We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. For the reasons expressed in City of Clearwater v. Acker, 755 So.2d 597 (Fla.1999), we answer the [906]*906certified question in the negative and approve the First District’s decision in this case.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Florida Department of Transportation v. Hogan, 780 So. 2d 905, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 98, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 332, 2001 WL 169612 (Fla. 2001).
780 So. 2d 905 (Florida Department of Transportation v. Hogan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
City of Clearwater v. Acker
755 So. 2d 597 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)
Department of Transportation v. Hogan
777 So. 2d 976 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)