Florida Department of Revenue v. Van Edwards

214 So. 3d 800, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5199
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 13, 2017
DocketCASE NO. 1D16-3160
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 214 So. 3d 800 (Florida Department of Revenue v. Van Edwards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Florida Department of Revenue v. Van Edwards, 214 So. 3d 800, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5199 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We hold that the Division of Administrative Hearings had subject matter jurisdiction to enter an order of child support. See Dep’t of Revenue v. Graczyk, 206 So.3d 157, 161 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016) (“Section 409.2563 confers concurrent jurisdiction on DOR/DOAH to establish child support obligations when there is no court order of support”) (emphasis added). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the Administrative Law Judge to order such child support as is appropriate.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ROWE, OSTERHAUS, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State, Department of Revenue ex rel. Murillo v. Murillo
216 So. 3d 785 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
214 So. 3d 800, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-department-of-revenue-v-van-edwards-fladistctapp-2017.