Florida Department of Revenue v. Van Edwards

214 So. 3d 800, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5199
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 13, 2017·No. CASE NO. 1D16-3160·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We hold that the Division of Administrative Hearings had subject matter jurisdiction to enter an order of child support. See Dep’t of Revenue v. Graczyk, 206 So.3d 157, 161 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016) (“Section 409.2563 confers concurrent jurisdiction on DOR/DOAH to establish child support obligations when there is no court order of support”) (emphasis added). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the Administrative Law Judge to order such child support as is appropriate.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ROWE, OSTERHAUS, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Florida Department of Revenue v. Van Edwards, 214 So. 3d 800, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5199 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

214 So. 3d 800 (Florida Department of Revenue v. Van Edwards) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State, Department of Revenue ex rel. Murillo v. Murillo
216 So. 3d 785 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)