Florida Corvette Calipers, Inc. v. Cincinnati Milacron Marketing Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Florida Corvette Calipers, Inc. v. Cincinnati Milacron Marketing Co.

646 So. 2d 293, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11896, 1994 WL 685931

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Florida Corvette Calipers, Inc. v. Cincinnati Milacron Marketing Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3561 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 7, 1994·No. No. 93-2755·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s post-trial dismissal of appellant’s counterclaim and appel-lee’s claim with prejudice and remand with direction to reinstate the jury verdicts, subject to the trial court’s reconsideration of appellee’s motions for remittitur and set off. In our view, the trial court was correct in admitting the testimony in question at trial; and its post-trial change of mind was in error. We are also not persuaded by appel-lee’s argument on the issue of the statute of limitations.

The cross-appeal for new trial is hereby rendered moot pursuant to our finding that the subject testimony was properly admitted.

GLICKSTEIN, KLEIN and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s post-trial dismissal of appellant’s counterclaim and appel-lee’s claim with prejudice and remand with direction to reinstate the jury verdicts, subject to the trial court’s reconsideration of appellee’s motions for remittitur and set off. In our view, the trial court was correct in admitting the testimony in question at trial; and its post-trial change of mind was in error. We are also not persuaded by appel-lee’s argument on the issue of the statute of limitations.

The cross-appeal for new trial is hereby rendered moot pursuant to our finding that the subject testimony was properly admitted.

GLICKSTEIN, KLEIN and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.

Florida Corvette Calipers, Inc. v. Cincinnati Milacron Marketing Co., 646 So. 2d 293, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11896, 1994 WL 685931 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

646 So. 2d 293 (Florida Corvette Calipers, Inc. v. Cincinnati Milacron Marketing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.