Florida Construction & Realty Co. v. Pournell

80 So. 54, 76 Fla. 395
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedOctober 31, 1918
StatusPublished

This text of 80 So. 54 (Florida Construction & Realty Co. v. Pournell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Florida Construction & Realty Co. v. Pournell, 80 So. 54, 76 Fla. 395 (Fla. 1918).

Opinion

Whitfield, J.

The “Florida Construction & Realty Company and Florida Railway, both corporations organized and existing under the laws of the State of Florida,” brought a bill in equity “against Florida Railway Company, also a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Forida,” in which it is in effect alleged that the “defendant was and still is a public service corporations duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Florida, and carrying on, conducting and operating a line of railroad;” that on June 13, 1913, the “Florida Construction & Realty Company obtained a final judgment against said defendant in the Circuit Court of Duval County, Florida, which, together with interest up to that time, and costs, would and does amount to the sum of one hundred and fifty-one thousand four hundred and fifty-one dollars and nineteen cents ($151,451.19); that said- judgment was and is duly recorded in the public records of said Duval County, Florida;” that on the same day “one Frank Drew obtained a final judgment [397]*397against said defendant, Florida Railway Company, in the Circuit Court of Duval County,. Florida, which, together with interest up to that time, and costs, would and- does amount to the sum of one hundred and thirty-six thousand, two hundred and thirty-five dollars and eightv-eight cents (f136,235.88) ; that said judgment was and is duly recorded in the public records of said Duval County, Florida;” that on July 12,1915, “said Frank Drew did for value transfer and assign said judgment and each and every his rights, claims, interests and demands thereunder to your orator, Florida Railway, a corporation as aforesaid; that by reason of said assignment, said complainant, Florida Railway, became and is the owner of said judgment and all the rights, interests, claims and demands thereunder;” that on November 11, 1913, “writs of execution were issued out of the Circuit Court of Du-val County, Florida, upon both of said judgments; that said executions are now in the hands of the Sheriff of said Duval County, Florida, and have not been satisfied either in whole or in part; that said judgments, and each of them, have been duly recorded in the public records of said counties of Taylor, Lafayette, Suwannee, Hamilton, Columbia, Baker, Duval and Nassau; that said judgments are liens on the aforesaid property of said deefndant, and are prior in time and dignity to any other valid lien or encumbrance thereon, except as hereinafter set forth; that said defendant, Florida Railway Company, although possessed of the aforesaid property, is insolvent in that it is unable, in the due course of its business, to meet its debts and obligations, as they mature; that said defendant owes to the State of Florida a large amount of money for taxes claimed by the State of Florida to be past due and unpaid; that said taxes, estimated by the State of Florida, amount to a sum up[398]*398wards of twelve thousand (f12,000.00) dollars; that the duly constituted authorities of the State of Florida are thereatening to sequester the property of said defendant for the payment of said amount, or so much thereof as may be legally and lawfully assessed against said defendant; that the only remedy at law afforded to your orators by the laws of the State of Florida is the sale of said property separately and severally each of the aforesaid counties in which said property, or any part thereof, is situated; that said remedy is totally inadequate to protect the rights and interests of your orators, in that said property is not susceptible of division; that sales of said property by piecemeal would greatly, if not completely, destroy its value, to the great prejudice of your orators; that such sale is, in the case of railroad companies, prohibited by law; that said property of said defendant being indivisible, and no provision having been made by the laws of the State of Florida for the sale of said property as an entirety to satisfy your orators lien that said judgments cannot therefore be satisfied for want of property of said defendant sbject to levy and sale, and that a court of equity is the only forum authorized to afford to your orators the relief to which they are entitled; that the defendants does not own or possess any other property out of. which the aforesaid judgments of your orators can be satisfied, other than such property as is necessarily used in the operation of said line of railroad already constructed and in course of construction.” The prayer is “that a receiver be app'ointed to receive and take possession of all of the property of said defendant of whatever nature and-kind, ánd that said receiver be authorized to operate said lines of railroad and to do any and all other things with reference thereto, as he may be directed from [399]*399time to time by this court; and that your orators may have such other and further relief in the premises as equity may require and to the court shall seem meet.”

A copy of the assignment of the Drew judgment was made an exhibit.

The defendant, by Frank Drew, its president, admitted the material allegations of the bill of complaint in an answer filed.

On July 13, 1915, the court ordered that “the foregoing cause having come on to be heard upon the bill of complaint and the answer of the defendant corporation, admitting the material allegations of said bill, and said defendant, by its solicitor, having consented to the granting of the prayers of said bill, it is

“ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DEGREED, that Frank Drew be and he is hereby appointed to be receiver of said defendant corporation to take charge of and operate the business and affairs of said corporation, under the direction of this court, and

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that said receiver shall have full power to collect the outstanding debts, claims and property due and belonging to said defendant corporation, with power to prosecute and defend, in the name of the corporation or otherwise, all claims or suits; to appoint an agent or agents to assist him; and to do such other things as may be necessary in carrying on, conducting and operating the business of said defendant corporation, and

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that said defendant corporation shall forthwith deliver over to said receiver all and every part of the property, both real and personal, estate, effects and business of said corporation, and all books, vouchers, accounts and all papers touch[400]*400ing the busines of said corporation, Or any part thereof, and

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that said receiver hereby appointed, before entering upon his duties as such receiver, shall give a bond in the penal sum of Twenty-five Thousand Dollars conditioned for the faithful performance of his duties as such receiver, which said bond shall be approved by this court, and

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that this order appointing the said receiver shall not be effective until after the filing and approval of said bond.”

“Thereafter the said receiver gave bond as required by the foregoing order, and having become duly qualified, entered upon the discharge of his duties.”

On December 31, 1915, the court made the following order:

“This cause coming on to be heard upon application of T. F. West, Attorney General of the State of Florida, and attorney for the intervener herein, and it appearing that an order was made in said cause on the 16th day of November last, whereby the receiver of said Railway Company, its property and assets, was directed and required to pay over to the said William V.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miltenberger v. Logansport Railway Co.
106 U.S. 286 (Supreme Court, 1882)
Gregg v. Metropolitan Trust Co.
197 U.S. 183 (Supreme Court, 1905)
Citizens Trust Co. v. National Equipment & Supply Co.
98 N.E. 865 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 So. 54, 76 Fla. 395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-construction-realty-co-v-pournell-fla-1918.