Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad v. City of Jacksonville

Supreme Court of Florida

Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad v. City of Jacksonville

40 Fla. 555

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 15, 1898·Published

Opinion

This action was brought by the plaintiff in error against the defendant in error. There was judgment for the defendant, and the plaintiff takes writ of error.

Writ of error dismissed because there is no evidence shown by the record that service has been made upon defendant in error of a scire facias ad audiendum errores, and there has been no appearance of the defendant in error that could be held to waive such service.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This action was brought by the plaintiff in error against the defendant in error. There was judgment for the defendant, and the plaintiff takes writ of error.

Writ of error dismissed because there is no evidence shown by the record that service has been made upon defendant in error of a scire facias ad audiendum errores, and there has been no appearance of the defendant in error that could be held to waive such service.

Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad v. City of Jacksonville, 40 Fla. 555 (Fla. 1898).

Pincite

40 Fla. 555 (Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad v. City of Jacksonville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.