FLORIDA CENTER FOR ORTHOPAEDICS v. Progressive Express Ins. Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

FLORIDA CENTER FOR ORTHOPAEDICS v. Progressive Express Ins. Co.

51 So. 3d 621, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 90, 2011 WL 111424

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 14, 2011

Docket5D10-1010

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 51 So. 3d 621 (FLORIDA CENTER FOR ORTHOPAEDICS v. Progressive Express Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

FLORIDA CENTER FOR ORTHOPAEDICS v. Progressive Express Ins. Co., 51 So. 3d 621, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 90, 2011 WL 111424 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We grant the petition for writ of certio-rari and quash the final order affirming the trial court’s summary final judgment. See United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Prof'l Med. Group, Inc., 26 So.3d 21 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009); see also Sys. Components Corp. v. Fla. Dep’t of Transp., 14 So.3d 967, 973, n. 4 (Fla.2009). We note, parenthetically, that the record reveals that the respondent concedes that the trial court erred in entering summary judgment in its favor and that the circuit court applied the wrong law in rendering the order under review affirming the summary judgment.

PETITION GRANTED; ORDER QUASHED.

GRIFFIN, SAWAYA and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We grant the petition for writ of certio-rari and quash the final order affirming the trial court’s summary final judgment. See United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Prof'l Med. Group, Inc., 26 So.3d 21 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009); see also Sys. Components Corp. v. Fla. Dep’t of Transp., 14 So.3d 967, 973, n. 4 (Fla.2009). We note, parenthetically, that the record reveals that the respondent concedes that the trial court erred in entering summary judgment in its favor and that the circuit court applied the wrong law in rendering the order under review affirming the summary judgment.

PETITION GRANTED; ORDER QUASHED.

GRIFFIN, SAWAYA and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 So. 3d 621, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 90, 2011 WL 111424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-center-for-orthopaedics-v-progressive-express-ins-co-fladistctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack