Florida Board of Bar Examiners re: W.F.H.
933 So. 2d 482, 2006 WL 1028668
Opinion
concurring in result only.
I concur only in this result. However, I believe that the Board erred and we erred in not making this decision at the time of W.F.H.’s first petition, rather than allowing W.F.H. to reapply when a reapplication was futile. I regret this for reasons of fundamental fairness.
CANTERO and BELL, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Florida Board of Bar Examiners re: W.F.H., 933 So. 2d 482, 2006 WL 1028668 (Fla. 2006).
933 So. 2d 482 (Florida Board of Bar Examiners re: W.F.H.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Florida Board of Bar Examiners
144 So. 3d 532 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2014)
Florida Board of Bar Examiners re Castro
87 So. 3d 699 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2012)
In Re Amendments to Rules of the Supreme Court Relating to Admissions to the Bar
52 So. 3d 652 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2010)
In re Inquiry Concerning Hall
49 Cal. 4th CJP Supp. 146 (State of California Commission On Judicial Performance, 2006)