Florida Board of Bar Examiners re Amendments to Rules of the Supreme Court Relating to Admissions to the Bar

967 So. 2d 877, 32 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 667, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 1904, 2007 WL 3024353
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedOctober 18, 2007
DocketNo. SC06-1074
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 967 So. 2d 877 (Florida Board of Bar Examiners re Amendments to Rules of the Supreme Court Relating to Admissions to the Bar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Florida Board of Bar Examiners re Amendments to Rules of the Supreme Court Relating to Admissions to the Bar, 967 So. 2d 877, 32 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 667, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 1904, 2007 WL 3024353 (Fla. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This matter is before the Court for consideration of proposed amendments to the Rules of the Supreme Court Relating to Admissions to the Bar (rules). We have jurisdiction, see art. V, § 15, Fla. Const., and, with minor modifications, adopt the proposed amendments.

The Florida Board of Bar Examiners (Board) petitions the Court to make numerous amendments to the rules. The proposed amendments were published in The Florida Bar News on August 1, 2006. No comments were received.

Many of the proposed amendments are minor changes to make the rules consistent with current style preferences. The Board also proposes substantive amendment of many of the rules. The major substantive changes the Board proposes are: (1) to combine the application for admission with the application to take the bar exam into one application; (2) to establish a given date as a deadline for the submission of a registrant’s application for a reduced fee rather than a deadline based on the number of days from the commencement of a registrant’s law school education; (3) to change the deadlines for applying to sit for the bar examination; (4) to eliminate the provision allowing an applicant to file an application to sit for the bar examination after the deadline; and (5) to provide that all applications must be completed and submitted online.

Several rules were amended to use the new terminology for the unified Bar application or to reflect substantive changes made to other rules. Several rules were essentially renumbered, in situations where a current rule was deleted but its language was revised and either put into a preexisting rule or into a newly created rule. For example, rule 2-26.1 is deleted and its language is put into the new rule 2-23.1.

The substantive amendments are briefly summarized below.

Rule 2-13.5 Found Unqualified by Board. The rule is amended to allow a person who has been denied admission to apply to sit for the general bar examination during the two-year period of disqualification. This amendment conforms the rule to this Court’s decision in Amendments to the Rules of the Supreme Court Relating to Admissions to the Bar, 695 So.2d 312, 314 (Fla.1997).

Rule 2-14 Reapplications for Admission. The rule is amended to clarify that reapplications for admission must be submitted online via the Board’s website and to bring it into conformance with amendments made to the other rules.

Rule 2-21 Applications and Rule 2-21.1 Exam Application. These rules consolidate the separate bar admission and examination applications currently required into a single application. Rule 2-21 is also amended to require an applicant to apply online.

Rule 2-21.2 Bar Application and Rule 2-21.3 Registration. Rule 2-21.2 is renamed “Registration”; the language currently in rule 2-21.3 pertaining to the registration of law students is moved to rule 2-21.2 and rule 2-21.3 is deleted. New language requiring the Registrant Bar Application to be completed and submitted online is also added to rule 2-21.2. The statement that a character and fitness investigation may take six to eight months is deleted because it is no longer accurate. The average length of character and fitness investigations is currently less than six to eight months.

Rule 2-22 Deadline for Filing a Bar Application. This rule is renamed “Char[879]*879acter and Fitness Investigation.” The amended language specifies that the character and fitness investigation will be conducted once a Bar Application or a Registrant Bar Application is received and will be updated once a Supplement to Registrant Bar Application is received. The language in the rule made obsolete by our adoption of a single bar application is deleted.

Rule 2-23 Forms for Application. We are deleting the language in the rule made obsolete by our adoption of the amendment to rule 2-21 (requiring all applicants for admission to The Florida Bar to apply online). The provisions of rules 2-25 and 2-26 are moved into rule 2-23 and the rule is renamed “Application Fees.”

Rule 2-23.1 Student Registrant Fee. The fee structure for registration with the Board by law students is relocated from rule 2-26.1 to this new rule 2-23.1. The new rule also changes the existing deadlines. Under the current rule, calculating the various deadlines for registration by law students begins from the date of “commencement of the study of law as certified by the law school.” Law schools, Florida’s included, commence classes on different dates and, therefore, the rule’s means of establishing deadlines resulted in different deadlines for students attending the various schools. The new rule 2-23.1 has two fixed-date deadlines that are applicable to all law students who commence their legal education during a particular time of year (fall, winter, or spring). For example, under the new rule 2-28.1, all students beginning law school in August or September will have a deadline of January 15 of the following year to receive the discounted fee of $75.

These fees and deadlines are not to be confused with the fees and deadlines found in Rule Regulating the Florida Bar 11-1.3 applicable to certified legal intern registration. See In re Amendments to Rules Regulating Fla. Bar re Chapter 11 Task Force, 964 So.2d 690 (Fla.2007). The certified legal intern registration form, although it is filed with the Florida Board of Bar Examiners and may request some of the same information concerning a registrant’s background as the Bar Application or a Registrant Bar Application, serves the sole purpose of triggering the background investigation necessary for the issuance of a clearance letter by the Board that will allow the certified legal intern registrant to participate in a law school practice program. The certified legal intern registration form is not the application for admission to The Florida Bar. Law school students who seek to participate in a law school practice program and who also intend to apply for admission to The Florida Bar should complete and file a Registrant Bar Application, as that application will accomplish both purposes.

Rule 2-24 Credit for Payment for Forms. This rule is deleted as obsolete in light of our amendment of rule 2-21, as hard copies of application forms will no longer be used.

Rule 2-28 Application Fee for Reapplication for Admission Based on Rehabilitation. Rule 2-28 is amended to clarify that it applies to applicants who were denied admission and that denial can occur by a Consent Judgment authorized by rule 3-23.9.

Rule 2-29 Stale File Fee. When a stale application has been on file with the Board for over five years, the Board will need to conduct a considerable investigation to update its original investigation for that application. This rule is amended to require repayment of the initial fee under these circumstances. The amendment also clarifies that the rule applies to disbarred attorneys under rule 2-23.6.

[880]*880Rule 2-30.2 Filed with the Court. The amendment clarifies the types of pleading's that are to be filed with the court and served on the parties. The amendment also establishes deadlines for serving the different pleadings.

Rule 3-14.1 Filed as an Applicant and Rule 3-14.2 Filed as a Registrant. The language requiring applicants to provide the Board with transcripts from all postsecondary institutions ever attended is deleted. These transcripts can be requested on a case-by-case basis, if needed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Haridopolos v. Citizens for Strong Schools, Inc.
81 So. 3d 465 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
967 So. 2d 877, 32 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 667, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 1904, 2007 WL 3024353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-board-of-bar-examiners-re-amendments-to-rules-of-the-supreme-court-fla-2007.