Florida Board of Bar Examiners re Amendment to Rules of the Supreme Court Relating to Admissions to the Bar

578 So. 2d 704, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 275, 1991 Fla. LEXIS 681, 1991 WL 64167
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedApril 25, 1991
DocketNo. 77063
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 578 So. 2d 704 (Florida Board of Bar Examiners re Amendment to Rules of the Supreme Court Relating to Admissions to the Bar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Florida Board of Bar Examiners re Amendment to Rules of the Supreme Court Relating to Admissions to the Bar, 578 So. 2d 704, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 275, 1991 Fla. LEXIS 681, 1991 WL 64167 (Fla. 1991).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Florida Board of Bar Examiners has petitioned for approval of certain amendments to the Rules of the Supreme Court Relating to Admissions to the Bar. The proposed amendments were published in The Florida Bar News on February 1, 1991, allowing interested parties an opportunity to file comments with this Court. No comments were filed.

The amendments and the rationale expressed by the Board concerning each amendment are set forth in the appendix to this opinion. Upon consideration, we now adopt the proposed amendments. These amendments shall become effective upon the issuance of this opinion.

It is so ordered.

SHAW, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, barkett, grimes, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.

APPENDIX

[Additions are underlined; deletions are struck- -through.]

Article I, Section 15 as it will appear:

Section 15. To the extent necessary to implement these rules and if not inconsistent herewith, the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure shall be applicable to all proceedings filed in the Supreme Court of Florida.

RATIONALE:

The proposed rule amendment creates a new section under Article I. In the past, the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure have been used on a de facto basis to provide guidance to parties before the Court for such items as motions for extension of time. The Board concluded that the authority for reliance upon the appellate rules should be formally sanctioned by the Court in the Rules of the Supreme Court of Florida Relating to Admissions to the Bar. A similar provision is set forth in Rule 3 — 7.6(f) of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar involving petitions for review in disciplinary proceedings.

Article II, Section 2 as it currently appears:

Section 2. If a law student timely files an early registration within one hundred fifty (150) days following the commencement of the study of law as specified in Article V, Section 7, the filing fee shall be $60.00.

Article II, Section 2 as it will appear:

Section 2. If a law student timely files an early registration within one hundred fifty-(-150) eighty (180) days following the commencement of the study of law as specified in Article V, Section 7, the filing fee shall be $60.00.

The deans of the Florida law schools have advised the Board that the current 150-day filing deadline often conflicts with course work and finals. By extending the deadline by 30 days, it is anticipated more law students will timely register with the Board and fewer registrations will be filed with the Board in a defective condition. Article III, Section l.b. as it currently appears:

Section 1. No applicant shall be admitted to the General Bar Examination unless he or she furnishes to the Board:

[[Image here]]

b. Satisfactory evidence of graduation from a full-time accredited law school at a time when or within 12 months of such accreditation, or in the alternative, satisfactory evidence that the applicant has completed the requirements for graduation [705]*705from a full-time accredited law school at a time when such law school was accredited or within 12 months of such accreditation, and that such accredited law school has or, in the alternative, will confer upon the applicant the degree of Bachelor of Laws or Doctor of Jurisprudence. The term “completed the requirements for graduation” refers to the time when completion of the requirements for graduation is recorded in the office of the law school dean or administrator. The term “accredited law school” has reference to any law school approved or provisionally approved by the American Bar Association or which is a member of the Association of American Law Schools. None of the following shall be substituted for law school training:

(1) Private study, correspondence school or law office training;
(2) Age or experience;
(3) Waived or lowered standards of legal training for particular persons or groups.

Article III, Section l.b. as it will appear:

Section 1. No applicant shall be admitted to the General Bar Examination unless he or she furnishes to the Board:

b. A sworn Application for Admission into the General Bar Examination attesting to Satisfactory-evidence of graduation from a full-time accredited law school at a time when or within 12 months of such accreditation, or in the alternative, satisfactory evidence that the applicant has completed completion of the requirements for graduation from a full-time accredited law school at a time when such law school was accredited or within 12 months of such accreditation, and that such accredited law school has or, in the alternative, will confer upon the applicant the degree of Bachelor of Laws or Doctor of Jurisprudence. The term “completed the requirements for graduation” refers to the time when completion of the requirements for graduation is recorded in the office of the law school dean or administrator. The term “accredited law school” has reference to any law school approved or provisionally approved by the American Bar Association or which is a member of the Association of American Law Schools. Results of the General Bar Examination shall be released pursuant to Article VI, Section 11 only to an applicant who has additionally furnished the Board with either a Certificate of Dean or an official final law school transcript which establishes that the law school graduation requirements were completed before the applicant submitted to the General Bar Examination. Failure to provide such additional document shall result in the im-poundment of an applicant’s grades until such time as the additional document is furnished. None of the following shall be substituted for law school training:

(1) Private study, correspondence school or law office training;
(2) Age or experience;
(3) Waived or lowered standards of legal training for particular persons or groups.

To expedite the processing of applications for admission to the Florida Bar Examination, the Board admits to the bar examination all applicants who have furnished a sworn statement of compliance with the requirement of graduation from a full-time accredited law school set forth in Article III, Section l.b. Grades of applicants who fail to provide satisfactory evidence of such graduation (i.e., a Certificate of Dean or an official final law school transcript) are, however, impounded by the Court pursuant to the Board’s recommendation. Although applicants are notified by the Board of the practice of impounding grades for failure to submit satisfactory evidence of law school graduation, the Board felt that such practice should also be referenced in the rules of the Court.

There are instances when the Board receives a Dean’s Certificate or official final law school transcript which does not establish the applicant’s compliance with the rule requiring graduation or completion of the requirements for graduation prior to sitting for the bar examination. The proposed rule amendment also makes it clear [706]*706that not only must applicants furnish a Dean’s Certificate or official transcript but that such item must also establish compliance with the rule.

Article III, Section 2 as it currently appears:

B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Florida Board of Bar Examiners
603 So. 2d 1160 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
Florida Board of Bar Examiners re R.L.V.H.
587 So. 2d 462 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
578 So. 2d 704, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 275, 1991 Fla. LEXIS 681, 1991 WL 64167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-board-of-bar-examiners-re-amendment-to-rules-of-the-supreme-court-fla-1991.