Florida Bar v. Wooten

Supreme Court of Florida

Florida Bar v. Wooten

487 So. 2d 1070, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 213, 1986 Fla. LEXIS 2026

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedMay 8, 1986

DocketNo. 67403

StatusPublished

This text of 487 So. 2d 1070 (Florida Bar v. Wooten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Florida Bar v. Wooten, 487 So. 2d 1070, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 213, 1986 Fla. LEXIS 2026 (Fla. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon a complaint by the Florida Bar this Court appointed a referee to conduct a hearing regarding Wooten’s alleged misconduct. Wooten tendered a conditional consent judgment for disbarment,

* acknowledging his violation of Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(1), 1-102(A)(3), 1-102(A)(4), 1-102(A)(6), 7-102(A)(5) and 7-102(A)(8) of the Code of Professional Responsibility and article XI, Rules 11.02(3)(a) and 11.02(3)(b) of the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar. The referee recommended that Wooten be found guilty in accordance with his conditional consent judgment, that he be disbarred from the practice of law effective January 12, 1984, that he shall be eligible for admission to the Bar on January 12, 1987, conditioned upon restoration of his civil rights and full compliance with all rules and regulations governing admission to the Bar including, but not limited to, successful passage of all portions of the Bar Examination.

Neither side contests the referee’s report which we hereby adopt. Wooten is disbarred from the practice of law effective, nunc pro tunc, January 12, 1984, and shall be eligible for admission to the Bar on January 12, 1987, on the conditions set forth above.

Judgment for costs in the amount of $150.00 is hereby entered against respondent, for which sum let execution issue.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, Acting C.J., and OVERTON, MCDONALD, SHAW and BARKETT, JJ., concur.

We feel it unnecessary to publish the full text of the plea. The Court file is open for inspection.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon a complaint by the Florida Bar this Court appointed a referee to conduct a hearing regarding Wooten’s alleged misconduct. Wooten tendered a conditional consent judgment for disbarment,

* acknowledging his violation of Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(1), 1-102(A)(3), 1-102(A)(4), 1-102(A)(6), 7-102(A)(5) and 7-102(A)(8) of the Code of Professional Responsibility and article XI, Rules 11.02(3)(a) and 11.02(3)(b) of the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar. The referee recommended that Wooten be found guilty in accordance with his conditional consent judgment, that he be disbarred from the practice of law effective January 12, 1984, that he shall be eligible for admission to the Bar on January 12, 1987, conditioned upon restoration of his civil rights and full compliance with all rules and regulations governing admission to the Bar including, but not limited to, successful passage of all portions of the Bar Examination.

Neither side contests the referee’s report which we hereby adopt. Wooten is disbarred from the practice of law effective, nunc pro tunc, January 12, 1984, and shall be eligible for admission to the Bar on January 12, 1987, on the conditions set forth above.

Judgment for costs in the amount of $150.00 is hereby entered against respondent, for which sum let execution issue.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, Acting C.J., and OVERTON, MCDONALD, SHAW and BARKETT, JJ., concur.

We feel it unnecessary to publish the full text of the plea. The Court file is open for inspection.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

487 So. 2d 1070, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 213, 1986 Fla. LEXIS 2026, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-bar-v-wooten-fla-1986.